行业新闻

原文：
By Allan R. Budris In the writer's first (August 2007) WaterWorld Pump Tips Column it was pointed out that there are certain basic traits that distinguish the best-of-class from the retroactive-fix-up pump users, whose associated pump costs are normally much higher. One such key trait is that best-of-class users do not purchase pumps Ball Valvesbased mainly on the lowest initial cost, but instead consider the total life cycle cost of the pump installation, which could be 20 times the initial pump cost. The primary objective of life cycle costing is to evaluate and/or optimize product life cost while satisfying specified performance, safety, reliability, maintainability, and other requirements. Pumping systems account for 25-50% of the energy usage in many industrial plants, and 20% of the world's electric energy demand. Centrifugal pumps rank first in failure incidents and maintenance costs. That is why centrifugal pumps in Check Valvescritical applications are often installed in identical pairs, with one serving as the operating and the other serving as the standby or spare pump. Despite these statistics, many pumps are still purchased based solely on the lowest initial purchase and installation cost. These decisions seem to disregard the fact that the initial cost is only a small part of the pump life cycle cost in high usage applications. Market conditions, short-term financial considerations, and organizational barriers are to blame for this short sighted environment. Progressive, reliability-focused pump users who seek to improve the profitability of their operations should, therefore, consider using Life Gate ValvesCycle Costing, or LCC. The conscientious application of LCC concepts will help plants minimize waste. LCC will also dramatically reduce energy, operation and maintenance costs. Life cycle pump cost is the total lifetime cost to: purchase, install, operate, and maintain (including associated downtime) the pump and associated support equipment, plus any environmental cost due to contamination from pumped liquid, and the disposal/decommissioning cost of a piece of equipment
原文来自： http://www.waterworld.com/index/display/article-display/9396725215/articles/waterworld/volume-25/issue-12/departments/pump-tips___techniques/key-considerations.html

Key Considerations for Pump Life Cycle Cost Reduction;是由上海埃非凯阀门有限公司提供的阀门新闻，中文译文仅供参考(海埃非凯阀门有限公司还生产球阀闸阀蝶阀截止阀止回阀及Y型过滤器，拉杆伸缩过滤器，篮式过滤器，T型过滤器，自动排污反冲洗过滤器，欢迎您的选购。)
以下是参考译文：

译文：
作者：Allan河布德里斯在作家的第一次（2007年8月）水世界泵提示列有人指出，有一些基本特征区别于追溯，整修工作获得最佳级泵的使用者，其有关的泵的造价一般要高得多。其中一个关键特征是最好的类的用户没有购买的基础上最低的成本主要是水泵，而是考虑的总生命周期泵的安装成本，这可能是最初的20倍泵的成本。在生命周期成本的主要目标是评估和/或优化产品生命成本，同时满足规定的性能，安全性，可靠性，可维护性，和其他要求。泵送系统占25-50％的能源使用在许多工业厂房，以及世界上20的电力能源需求％。离心泵排名第一的失效造成的事故和维修费用。这就是为什么在关键应用离心泵往往是相同的成对安装，其中一个为经营服务及其他服务的待机或备用泵。尽管这些统计数字，许多泵仍然只购买最低最初购买和安装成本为基础。这些决定似乎无视这一事实，最初的成本仅是一个泵的寿命高的使用周期成本应用的一小部分。市场条件下，短期资金的考虑，和组织的障碍是，这不能怪短视的环境。渐进性，可靠性为中心的泵的使用者谁寻求改善其业务盈利能力，因此，应考虑使用生命周期成本，或合格证明书。持有LCC概念的良心，可协助工厂减少浪费。持有LCC还将极大地减少能源，运行和维护费用。泵生命周期成本的总寿命成本：购买，安装，运营和维护（包括相关的停机时间），泵和相关辅助设备，加上由于环境成本从抽出液体污染及处置/退役成本件的设备